Disposed

Piyush Singh v. Anant Kumar

Patna HC2 Sept 2024C.Misc./775/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner-defendant challenged trial court orders granting status quo on the suit property while his Order 7 Rule 11 application was pending. The High Court held the rejection-of-plaint application must be decided first and directed the trial court accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Trial court directed to take up and dispose of the Order 7 Rule 11 application dated 16.07.2024 before considering the injunction application.

Piyush Singh Vs Anant Kumar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.775 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Piyush Singh, Son of late Janardan Prasad, R/o- 2C Laxmi Ashram Apartment, Nalanda Colony, Khajpura, Rukanpura, Patna, Bihar- 800014.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Anant Kumar, Son of late Nagendra Kumar Singh Rathor, R/o- MauzaKinzer, P.S. Karpi, District- Gaya.

¶7

Smt. Sita Devi, Wife of late Janardan Singh, D/o of late Dulari Charan Singh@ DulariSharan Singh, Resident of Flat No. 2/C, Luxmi Ashram Apartment, Nalanda Colney, Khajpura, Post -Bihar Veternary College, P.S. Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna.

¶8

Rahul Sinha, Son of Nirmal Kumar Singh, Resident of A/ 803, Basu Kamal Saki, Bihar Road, Saki Bihar Teliphone Exhange, Andheri East, Mumbai, State (Maharashtra) Pin- 400072.

¶9

Smt. Rashmi Sinha, Wife of Sri Mani Bhushan Kumar Sinha, D/o of Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha, Resident of D/205, Triveni Apartment, Airport Road, Hinu, Ranchi, State-Jharkhand Pin- 834002

¶10

Smt. Shilpi Sinha, Wife of Sri Jaikant Mishra, D/o nof Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha, Resident of 216 Basant Enclave Basant Bihar, Kusumpur, (South West), Delhn Pin Code- 110057.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate Mr.Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶14

Date : 02-09-2024

¶15

The record has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and I intend to dispose of the present petition at the stage of admission itself.

¶17

The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 09.08.2024 & 12.08.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge

¶18

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.775 of 2024 dt.02-09-2024 2/3

¶19

(Senior Division) 1^st , Patna City in Title Suit No. 168 of 2024 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court granted status quo on the suit property till disposal of the injunction petition.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 16.07.2024, the petitioner/defendant no.1 filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’). Thereafter, the matter was listed on 09.08.2024 and other side was directed to file reply to the said application. Again on 12.08.2024, at the request of the plaintiff/other side, further time was granted for filing reply and the matter has been fixed for 13.09.2024. The learned counsel further submits that by various pronouncements, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that if the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code has been filed, the same needs to be taken up on priority basis and the learned trial court granting injunction by way of maintaining status quo vide orders dated 28.06.2024 till 12.08.2024 is against the settled principles of law.

¶21

From perusal of the impugned orders, I find that status quo has been granted till the disposal of the application filed for injunction. However, if an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code has been pending, it is incumbent upon the

¶22

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.775 of 2024 dt.02-09-2024 3/3

¶23

learned trial court to dispose of the same before entering into the merits of the case and taking up the injunction application once the defendants have appeared and objected to maintaining of the suit itself.

¶24

In view of above, I do not think there is any need to issue notice to the other side.

¶25

Accordingly, the learned trial court is directed to take up the application dated 16.07.2024 filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code by the defendant/petitioner and dispose of it before taking up any application for injunction.

¶26

With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant petition stands disposed of.

¶27

Pending application (I.A. No. 01 of 2024) also stands disposed of.

¶28

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶29

V.K.Pandey/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	03.09.2024
Transmission Date	NA

Piyush Singh v. Anant Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Piyush Singh v. Anant Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saryu Bhagat @ Saryu Mali Vs the State of Bihar

Birendra Das @ Virendra Ravi Das Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Masoom Vs the State of Bihar

Subodh Sah Vs Prem Chandra Sah

Sikandar Kumar @ Sikandar Mahto Vs Mostt. Sulochana Devi

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar