Civil miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order directing the petitioner to file a substitution petition for the sole respondent within four weeks; no substitution petition was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.743 of 2023
======================================================
Ayub Miyan @ Aub Miya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Rajendra Prasad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
... ... Respondent/s
4 13-05-2024 On 06.02.2024, the following order was passed:-
“Perusal of office note shows notice issued upon sole respondent could not be served due to health of respondent.
2. Under he circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file substitution petition for sole respondent within four weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. 3. List this matter on 12.03.2024.”
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.743 of 2023(4) dt.13-05-2024 2/2
miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
balmukund/-
U
Ayub Miyan @ Aub Miya
Rajendra Prasad
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
