Dismissed¶23

Ushlal Sah v. Dinesh Prasad and Ors.

Patna HC9 Jan 2024C.Misc./740/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of civil miscellaneous petition as infructuous; permission to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; Patna High Court single-judge oral order dated 09-01-2024; parties from Muzaffarpur, Bihar (Ushlal Sah v. Dinesh Prasad, Gayatri Devi, State of Bihar, P.W.D./C.P.W.D. officials); typographical correction of order dated 12.12.2023 (Pleader Commissioner; seeks); no statutory or precedent citation.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶23

Ushlal Sah Vs Dinesh Prasad and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.740 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ushlal Sah Son of Late Chatarbhuj Sah. Resident of Mohalla- Brahampura, P.O. M.I.T, P.S. Brahampura Munsifi Muzaffarpur East, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Dinesh Prasad Son of Ram Chandra Sah.

¶7

Gayatri Devi Wife of Raj Kishore Ojha, Respondent No. 1 Resident of Mohalla- Brahampura Chauk, Sanjay Cinema Road, P.O. M.I.T, P.S. Brahampura Munsifi Muzaffarpur East, District- Muzaffarpur and Respondent No. 2 Resident of Baleshar Thakur Marg, Brahampura, P.S. Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Collector, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Secretary P.W.D. Central Govt. Delhi.

¶10

The Superintendent Engineer C.P.W.D. North Bihar Circle R.C.D. at Maripur, P.S. Kazi Mohamadpur, Di

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AC to GP-3 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 09-01-2024

¶16

Perusal of previous order dated 12.12.2023 shows that inadvertently, in second paragraph, in place of ‘Pleader Commissioner’, ‘Pleading Commissioner’ has been mentioned and similarly in third paragraph, in place of ‘seeks’, ‘sought’ has been mentioned.

¶17

Since the aforesaid errors are typographical in

¶18

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.740 of 2017(3) dt.09-01-2024 2/2

¶19

nature, as such, it is corrected to the extent that in place of ‘Pleading Commissioner’, ‘Pleader Commissioner’ and in place of ‘sought’, ‘seeks’ be read.

¶20