Jawala Rai v. Hira Lal Rai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw the civil miscellaneous petition as infructuous; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.725 of 2017
======================================================
Jawala Rai Son of Badhu Rai, Resident of Village- Tarachak, Police StationDanapur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. J.S. Arora, Sr. Advocate
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.725 of 2017(3) dt.23-01-2024 2/2
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 23-01-2024 Learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
withdrawn.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Amrendra/-
U
Jawala Rai
Hira Lal Rai
Sursh Rai
Geeta Devi
Shanti Devi
Sudhir Kumar Singh
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court