Dismissed¶17

Sweta Kumari v. Kumar Vishal

Patna HC18 Jul 2024C.Misc./441/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of petition with liberty to deposit cost; Patna High Court; C.Misc. No.441 of 2024; Sweta Kumari v. Kumar Vishal; cost of Rs. 3,000/-; order dated 12.01.2024 of Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali; impugned order dated 19.03.2024; Section 21B(2) Hindu Marriage Act 1955; six-month disposal of matrimonial case; Arun Kumar Jha, J.; decided 18-07-2024; dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to deposit the cost of Rs. 3,000/- in terms of the order of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali dated 12.01.2024, within two weeks from the date of the order; the Family Court directed to dispose of the pending matrimonial case within six months from receipt/production of a copy of this order. ¶17

Sweta Kumari Vs Kumar Vishal — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.441 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sweta Kumari, w/o Kumar Vishal and D/O Arun Kumar Mishra, at present Resident of Village- Kharjamma Mahanar, P.S- Mahanar, District- Vaishali,

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus Kumar Vishal, S/O Vijay Kumar Jha, Resident of Village and PostMadhurapur, P.S- Bidupur, Distirct- Vaishali

¶6

... ... Respondent/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance :

¶8

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Madhukar Anand, Advocate Mr. Aalekh Anand, Advocate Mr. Sourav Suman, Advocate Mr. Saubham Kr. Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 18-07-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned senior counsel for the respondent.

¶12

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to allow the petitioner to deposit cost of Rs. 3,000/- as ordered by the learned trial court on 12.01.2024.

¶13

Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner refused to make the payment of cost of Rs. 3,000/- and this fact has been recorded by the learned trial court in the impugned order dated 19.03.2024. Learned senior counsel further submits that if indulgence is shown to the petitioner in allowing liberty

¶14

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.441 of 2024(5) dt.18-07-2024 2/2

¶15

to deposit the cost as directed by the learned trial court on 12.01.2024, the learned trial court may be directed to dispose of the matrimonial case pending before it within a stipulated time period since Section 21B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 enjoins the court to dispose of any matter pending before it within six months.

¶16

Having regard to the rival submission of the parties, the present civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to deposit the cost in terms of order of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali dated 12.01.2024 which will pass further consequential orders. The petitioner will deposit the cost within two weeks from the date of this order. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali is further directed to take steps for disposal of the matter pending before it within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶17

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present civil miscellaneous petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

balmukund/-

¶20

Sweta Kumari v. Kumar Vishal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sweta Kumari v. Kumar Vishal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Vs M/s Walia Builders

Udit Ranjan Vs Sri Uday Prasad Singh

Shyam Bihari Yadav @ Shyam Bihari Singh Vs Sri Ramniwas Singh @ Sriniwas Singh

Hira Prasad Vs Rajkumar Choudhary

Balmiki Singh Vs Madan Kumar Singh

Ramesh Bari @ Ramesh Kumar Bari Vs Dinesh Yadav