Court corrected the case number in impugned order from C.W.J.C. to C. Misc., recalled the order set down in wrong case number and treated it as passed in C. Misc. 1806 of 2019.
The order dated 18.09.2023 recorded in C.W.J.C. No. 1806 of 2019 is recalled and to be treated as passed in C. Misc. No. 1806 of 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1806 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mahendra Prasad Bhartee For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 06-03-2024
This case has come under the heading “To be
Mentioned”.
2 . The following order was passed on 18.09.2023
in C. Misc. 1806 of 2019:-
“Heard the parties.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1806 of 2019(3) dt.06-03-2024 2/3
allowed in the present case. Rest of the amendments can be allowed as they do not change the nature of the suit.
Proposed Amendments
“ 1. In cause title
page no. 1 before Ram Raj Chaudhary and after both sons of the word "Late" Likewise in verification and affidavit of the plaint Late Ram Raj Chaudhary has been typed. The word "Late" before name of Ram Raj Chaudhary from affidavit and verification the plaint allowed to be deleted.
2. In plaint para 6 in line 4 after Amit Chaudhary before words and the words daughter Sangita Chaudhary and husband Ram Raj Chaudhary" be allowed to be added. At page 11 in genealogy in between names of Prashant Kumar Chaudhary and Amit Kr. Chaudhary the daughter name "Sangita Chaudhary" be allowed to be added.
3. In para no. 5 in line 7 of the plaint after Amit Chaudhary the words “and a daughter Sangita Chaudhary” be allowed to be added.”
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1806 of 2019(3) dt.06-03-2024 3/3
to the above extent.”
3 . It has been pointed out that the order was passed in C. Misc. No. 1806 of 2019 but due to inadvertence, the same has been recorded in C.W.J.C. No. 1806 of 2019.
4 . Let the same be corrected and the order dated
18.09.2023 be treated to be passed in C.Misc. No. 1806 of 2019.
5 . The order dated 18.09.2023 which was inadvertently recorded in C.W.J.C. No. 1806 of 2019 is hereby recalled.
6 . Consigned.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an order of C.W.J.C. No. 1806 of 2019 was inadvertently recorded instead of C miscellaneous 1806 of 2019.
Whether to recall the order recorded in C.W.J.C. No. 1806 of 2019.
Whether to treat the order as passed in C. Misc. No. 1806 of 2019.
Ramki Devi @ Manki Devi W/o Late Jhalak Prasad Singh
Sanjay Kumar
Amrendra Kumar @ Raju Kumar
Prashant Kumar Choudhary
Amit Kumar Choudhary
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
