Dismissed¶15

Ashendra Kumar Prasad v. Veenita Kumari

Patna HC10 Dec 2024C.Misc./1541/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ashendra Kumar Prasad v. Veenita Kumari; withdrawal of petition as infructuous; permission to withdraw accorded; dismissed as withdrawn; maintenance of Rs. 17,000/- per month and litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/- under order dated 13.09.2024 in Maintenance Case No. 208 (M) of 2010, Family Court, Patna; interim maintenance in Divorce Case No. 75 of 2011, order dated 03.06.2017, Family Court, Saran at Chhapra.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶15

Ashendra Kumar Prasad Vs Veenita Kumari — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1541 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ashendra Kumar Prasad Son of Late Ram Bihari Prasad, Resident of VillageChand Barwan, Tola- Chakla, P.S.- Mashrak, District- Saran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Veenita Kumari Daughter of Chandra Prabhash Singh, Resident of VillageDev Bahaura, P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran.

¶7

... ... Respondent/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-12-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance Case No. 208 (M) of 2010, the petitioner has been directed to make payment of maintenance amount of Rs. 17,000/- per month apart from payment of Rs. 25,000/- towards litigation cost on the petition of the respondent. Learned counsel further submits that this amount of maintenance is to include the amount of interim maintenance allowed to the respondent in Divorce Case No. 75 of 2011 vide order dated 03.06.2017 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saran at Chhapra. Thus, the learned counsel submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has to now challenge the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal

¶11

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1541 of 2017(2) dt.10-12-2024 2/2

¶12

Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance Case No. 208 (M) of 2010. Thus, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw

¶13

the present petition as it has become infructuous.

¶14