Petition dismissed after petitioners failed to file a required jointness affidavit within the deadline set by an earlier court order; request for extension was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1297 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
| =============== Appearance : |
==== | =================================== |
|---|---|---|
For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s |
: : |
Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate Mrs.Rina Kumari, Advocate |
| =============== CORAM: HONOU |
==== RABL |
=================================== E MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA |
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1297 of 2017(9) dt.02-12-2024 2/2
ORAL ORDER
9 02-12-2024 On 25.10.2024, the following order was passed:-
“Learned counsel for the
petitioners is directed to file jointness affidavit of respondent nos. 1(i) to 1(v) with their family member Ujjawal Kant Sharma within three weeks of opening of the Court after Chhath Puja Holidays, failing which the petition will be dismissed.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-
U
Satish Kumar
Arvind Kumar Sinha @ Arun Kumar
Ashutosh Kumar Sharma @ Ashok Kumar
Piues Kumar
Gunjan Kumar
Kundan Kumar
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
