This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.75 of 2018
======================================================
Smt. Neelam Chaubey
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Jaiprakash Tiwari
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Nutan Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
22 03-05-2024
For non-appearance of appellant, notice was issued to the appellant. Appellant was not available in the given address and notice was affixed on door (facing East). The appellant may not be interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 75 of 2018 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
abhishekkr/-
U
Smt. Neelam Chaubey
Jaiprakash Tiwari
P. B. Bajanthri
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
