Dismissed

NTPC Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2024MA/162/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In four miscellaneous appeals arising from assessments for 2008-09 to 2011-12, the Patna High Court upheld the Tribunal's order classifying Light Diesel Oil (LDO) under 'Diesel and Petrol' tax entry. The court rejected the assessee's claim for a lower rate, dismissing the appeals.

What did the court decide?

Appeals dismissed. The classification of Light Diesel Oil (LDO) is upheld under Entry 22 at 16% tax rate.

NTPC Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.161 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

NTPC Ltd. having its Registered Office at NTPC Bhawan, Scope Complex, 7 Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- 110003 and Regional Office at 2nd Floor, Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, New Dak Buglow Road, Patna800001.

¶4

... ... Appellant/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶7

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

Commercial Taxes Officer, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

with

¶13

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 160 of 2017

¶14

======================================================

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶19

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶20

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶21

Commercial Taxes Officer, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶22

... ... Respondent/s

¶23

======================================================

¶24

with

¶25

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 162 of 2017

¶26

======================================================

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶31

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶32

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶33

Commercial Taxes Officer, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶34

... ... Respondent/s

¶35

Patna High Court MA No.161 of 2017 dt.10-12-2024 2/5

¶36

======================================================

¶37

with

¶38

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 163 of 2017

¶39

======================================================

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶44

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶45

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶46

Commercial Taxes Officer, West Circle, Muzaffarpur.

¶47

... ... Respondent/s

¶48

======================================================

¶49

Appearance :

¶50

(In Miscellaneous Appeal No. 161 of 2017) For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar, GA-9 (In Miscellaneous Appeal No. 160 of 2017) For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar, GA-9 (In Miscellaneous Appeal No. 162 of 2017) For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar, GA-9 (In Miscellaneous Appeal No. 163 of 2017) For the Appellant/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar, GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA CAV JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶51

Date : 10-12-2024

¶52

The appeals arise from the orders of assessment as confirmed by the Tribunal in the years, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12.

¶53

The issue raised is identical and the Tribunal has rejected the appeals by a common order for all the assessment

¶54

Patna High Court MA No.161 of 2017 dt.10-12-2024 3/5

¶55

years. We refer to the orders produced in M.A. No. 161 of 2017.

¶56

Before the Tribunal, the assessee had two contentions, one regarding the entry tax rate of Light Diesel Oil (LDO) which according to the assessee came under the residuary Entry no. 23, whereas the Assessing Officer taxed it @ 16% being included in Entry no. 22, which refers to ‘Diesel and Petrol’. The other issue was with respect to ‘steel structures’ said to have been purchased by the petitioner which in the return was shown as exigible to tax at 4% being ‘iron and steel’. The Tribunal found that even before the lower authorities, the petitioner had admitted the mistake of application of lower rate on the ‘steel structures’, which were meant for power plants to be used for power generation. The said issue, hence, does not arise before us and was not argued by the learned Counsel.

¶57

Insofar as the classification to Light Diesel Oil (LDO), following question arise before us:

¶58

(i) Whether, LDO is taxable under 8% as covered under Entry no. 23 of the Bihar Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or

¶59

Patna High Court MA No.161 of 2017 dt.10-12-2024 4/5

¶60

Sale Therein Act, 1993 or under Entry

¶61

no. 22 taxable at 16%?

¶62

Entry no’s 22 and 23 from S.O. 95 dated 31^st

¶63

July, 2008 are extracted hereunder:

¶64

Sl. No.	Description of goods	Rate (inpercent)
Entryno. 22	Diesel and Petrol	16%
Entry no. 23	All other petroleum	products 8%
	except those specified	in S.No
	22&26

¶65

The Tribunal looked into every contention raised by the appellant, which was of common parlance test and the user test. Before us also the learned Counsel for the appellant argued that LDO is not put to use as High Speed Diesel or even Diesel which are all used for different purposes.

¶66

From the above entries extracted, we find that diesel and petrol takes in every such component, whether it be LDO, High Speed Diesel or diesel alone and as the Tribunal found the user test is not at all significant. Under common parlance test also, all these derivatives of diesel come under the common definition of diesel.

¶67

We find absolutely no reason to interfere with

¶68

Patna High Court MA No.161 of 2017 dt.10-12-2024 5/5

¶69

the order of the Tribunal and answer the question of law in

¶70

favour of the revenue and against the assessee.

¶71

The appeal stands dismissed.

¶72

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶73

Nani Tagia, J: I agree

¶74

(Nani Tagia, J)

¶75

aditya/-

¶76

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE	04.12.2024
Uploading Date	11.12.2024
Transmission Date

NTPC Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

NTPC Ltd. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Munna Vs The State of Bihar

Mayur Traders Vs Principal Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise

Ajay Kumar Lal Vs The State of Bihar

Chakarapani Himanshu Vs The State of Bihar

NTPC Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

NTPC Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar