Petitioners in a writ petition regarding service matters were subsequently appointed on a regular basis. The High Court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9595 of 2012
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Kant Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.9595 of 2012(5) dt.30-01-2024 2/2
withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition became infructuous due to the appointment of petitioners on regular basis?
Paras Nath Singh And Ors
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Public Health Engineering Department
The Engineer In Chief Public Health Engineering Department
The Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering Department
The Superintending Engineer, P.H. Circle, Darbhanga
The Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Begusarai
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
