Mahendra Pandey v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. The writ application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8983 of 2012
======================================================
MAHENDRA PANDEY Son Of Late Bajrangi Pandey Retired Karaya Darshak, Main West Canal Division, Balmiki Nagar West Champaran, At Present Resident Of Village - Badka Lauhar, P.O. Farna, Police StationBarhara, District - Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shyam Kishor Sharma, GA-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State was present.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/- U
Mahendra Pandey
The State Of Bihar
The Engineer-In-Chief, Canal Division, Patna
The Principal Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Water Resources Department, Patna
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran
The Superintending Engineer, Shirsha Karya Anchal, Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court