Disposed

Md. Moteen v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2024CWJC/8498/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order directs the petitioner to file a detailed representation for regularization of service with Respondent No. 3. The Director is instructed to consider the representation and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks after affording an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to file detailed representation for regularization of service; direction to Director to pass reasoned order within eight weeks after hearing.

Md. Moteen Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8498 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Moteen S/o Md. Alauddin Monsoori, Resident of Village and P.O. Jhajhihat, P.S. Pupri, District - Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Director Primary and Secondary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

District Magistrate - cum - Collector, District- Sitamarhi.

¶10

District Teacher Appellate Authority, Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.S. Tiwary, AC to AAG-15

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 08-08-2024

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

counsel for the State.

¶18

By filing the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

¶19

(i) For issuance of writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner who is Data Entry Operator/Computer Operator in District - Teacher Appellate Authority, Dumra, Sitamarhi since 28.04.2010 on contract basis and to pay him his salary as permanent Government employee.

¶20

(ii) For issuance of such other appropriate writ/order/direction, which may deem fit and proper.

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.8498 of 2021(3) dt.08-08-2024 2/2

¶22

Considering the prayers made in the writ petition, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Director, Primary & Secondary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna (respondent no.3) within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The respondent no. 3 is well-advised to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of any such representation filed by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his counsel.

¶23

It is made clear that the respondent no.3 shall be held responsible for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

¶24

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

Guddu/-

¶27

Md. Moteen v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Moteen v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Chaudhary @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Biteshwar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Pawra @ Rajesh Pabra Vs the State of Bihar

Raghwendra Pratap Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Modi Vs The State of Bihar