Disposed

Mr. Vaibhav Singh v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

Patna HC4 Jul 2024CWJC/8331/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging an income-tax assessment order on the ground that the petitioner's request for personal hearing through video conferencing was ignored. The court held this violated natural justice and disposed of the petition directing facilitation of a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Assessment order vitiated for denial of hearing; respondent to facilitate hearing through National Faceless Assessment Centre.

Mr. Vaibhav Singh Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre — Income Tax | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8331 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mr. Vaibhav Singh Son of Indu Shekhar Prasad Singh Resident of Plot 115,

¶4

Phase I, Ashiana Nagar P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi Through the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 2nd Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium New Delhi- 110003.

¶8

The Income-tax Officer Ward 6(1), Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶13

Date : 04-07-2024

¶14

The contention of petitioner against the Assessment Order at Annexure-P/1 is that no opportunity for hearing was granted despite the same having been prayed for, as is evident from Annexure-P/8.

¶15

Annexure-P/8 is a print out from the e-portal of

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.8331 of 2024 dt.04-07-2024 2/3

¶17

the Income Tax Department which indicates that the petitioner had made a request for video conferencing on 24.11.2023. Admittedly, the request was not considered. We also notice from Annexure-P/7, the objection filed by the petitioner, that they had specifically requested to provide an opportunity for personal hearing through video conferencing, if the objection is not found to be satisfactory by the Assessing Officer.

¶18

In the above circumstance, there is clear violation of principles of natural justice. Though the assessment is to be carried out by the National Faceless Assessment Centre on a request for personal hearing the same has to be granted. In fact the portal also has a facility by which a request can be made which has been made by the petitioner as per Annexure-P/8. It was only incumbent on the part of the National Faceless Assessment Centre to have granted that opportunity. We find the order to be vitiated for violation of principles of natural justice.

¶19

We make it clear that we have not made any observation on the merits of the assessment. The petitioner shall produce the judgment before the 2^nd respondent who

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.8331 of 2024 dt.04-07-2024 3/3

¶21

shall fecilitate the hearing through National Faceless Assessment Centre.

¶22

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶24

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶25

ranjan/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 05.07.2024 Transmission Date NA

Mr. Vaibhav Singh v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Vaibhav Singh v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Sri Ram Enterprises Vs The State of Bihar

Kamta Prasad Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Lalit Agency Vs The State of Bihar

Raghupati Singh Vs The Union of India

Santosh Kumar Vs The Union of India