The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition following the confiscation of material by respondent authorities to challenge the confiscation order separately. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8117 of 2020
======================================================
Vedant Bhawanath Pandey @ Vedant Son of Shri Bhawanath Pandey Resident of ID- No. 30, Disha Sanskruti, Silk City, Itkheda Paithan Road, P.S.- Satara, District- Aurangabad (Maharashthra).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dr.K.N.Singh (ASG) Mr. Anshuman Singh, CGC Mr. Anshay Bahadur Mathur, CGC ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, material has been confiscated by the respondent authorities, therefore, he intends
Patna High Court CWJC No.8117 of 2020(9) dt.08-04-2024 2/2
to withdraw the writ petition in order to challenge the
confiscation order.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Spd/-
U
Vedant Bhawanath Pandey @ Vedant
The Union of India Through Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)
The Additional Commissioner cum Adjudicating Authority Customs (Preventive)
The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Purnea)
The Inspector of Customs Customs (P) Circle, Purnea cum Seizing Officer
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
