Contractors challenged blacklisting orders alleging the show-cause notice violated a fifteen-day notice stipulation from an earlier writ order. The court held no objection was filed between notice and final order, so the notice was not defective, and dismissed the petitions with liberty to raise other contentions in appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7738 of 2024
======================================================
Rajiv Kumar Saha S/o Umesh Prasad Saha, R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Ward No. 29, Dharamganj, PO and PS-Kishanganj, Pin Code-855108, DistrictKishanganj, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8493 of 2024
======================================================
Pawan Kumar S/O Rajeshwar Singh, R/O Ward No. 23, Club Road, Das Para, Ruidhasa, P.S.- Kishanganj, PinCode- 855107, District- Kishanganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.7738 of 2024 dt.12-07-2024 2/3
Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7738 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Government Advocate (5) (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8493 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Government Advocate 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 12-07-2024
Both these cases were posted together since the question of law raised in both the writ petitions was the noncompliance of fifteen days notice stipulated by a learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 12736 of 2021 , titled Ramanand Rai v. The State of Bihar & Ors. d ated 07.09.2021, produced as Annexure-P/8.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7738 of 2024 dt.12-07-2024 3/3
that the petitioner cannot take a contention that the show-cause notice was defective.
above liberty.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Nani Tagia, J)
aditya/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 12.07.2024. |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether failure to comply with the fifteen days' notice stipulated in Ramanand Rai rendered the show-cause notice defective.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ramanand Rai v. The State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶1
C.W.J.C. No. 12736 of 2021 dated 07.09.2021
Rajiv Kumar Saha
Pawan Kumar
The State of Bihar through Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Additional Chief Executive Officer cum Secretary, Bihar Rural Road Development Agency (BRRADA)
The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary, Rural Works Department
The Chief Engineer-2, Rural Works Department
K. Vinod Chandran
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
