Disposed

Md. Shamim Anjum v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Dec 2024CWJC/7710/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court declined to entertain the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner had an alternative and efficacious statutory remedy by filing an appeal before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector under Clause 32(3) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016. The petition was disposed of with liberty to appeal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach District Magistrate-cum-Collector by way of appeal within two weeks.

Md. Shamim Anjum Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7710 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Shamim Anjum Son of Hafiz Md. Taha, Resident of Village- Raj Tektar, Ward- 13, P.S.- Hayaghat, Distt- Darbhanga, PIN- 847301 ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶6

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

¶7

The Licensing Authority-Cum-Sub-Divisional Officer, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶8

The Block Supply Officer, Singhwara.

¶9

Md. Rashid Husain, Son of Akhtar Hussain, Resident of Village- Tektar, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga. ... Respondents

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Rana Veer Prawar, AC to GP VI ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 05-12-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

Even though, the learned counsel appearing on

¶15

behalf of the petitioner has argued at length on merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of preferring a statutory appeal before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Darbhanga, under Clause 32(3) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016. The present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Darbhanga, (Respondent No. 2) by way of appeal within a period of two weeks from today.

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.7710 of 2024(2) dt.05-12-2024 2/2

¶17

On such appeal being filed, the District Magistrate-cumCollector, Darbhanga, (Respondent No. 2) shall consider the same on merits and pass a reasoned orders in accordance with law.

¶18

It is needless to mention that before passing any order, the authorities concerned shall give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the appeal by the petitioner. Any order passed shall be communicated to the parties.

¶19

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶20

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

¶21

Shamshad/-

¶22

Md. Shamim Anjum v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shamim Anjum v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Malhotra Polyplast, Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Keyal Beverage and Food Udyog Private Limited Vs The State of Bihar

Bibi Sanobar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashrya Prasad Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar