Disposed¶25

Umashankar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Aug 2024CWJC/7546/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.7546 of 2021; Umashankar Choudhary v. State of Bihar; Patna High Court; Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.; 13-08-2024; Education Department; Katihar; Barari; Gram Panchayat Raj Purvi Barinagar; Mukhiya; Panchayat Secretary; Amardeep Prasad; Vigilance Investigation Bureau Teacher Employment Cell; District Appellate Authority; appeal within four weeks; delay condonation; personal hearing; reasoned and speaking order; disposed.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of: petitioner to file appeal before the District Appellate Authority within four weeks with all supporting documents; delay, if any, to be condoned; Authority to afford personal hearing or hearing through counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously. ¶25

Umashankar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7546 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Umashankar Choudhary Son of Late Chulhai Choudhary Resident of VillageGurubazar, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Katihar.

¶10

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Katihar.

¶11

The Block Education Officer, Barari, Katihar.

¶12

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Purvi Barinagar, Barari, Katihar.

¶13

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Purvi Barinagar, Barari, Katihar.

¶14

Amardeep Prasad Son of Radhey Prasad Resident of Village and P.O.Gurubazar, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar.

¶15

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau through the Superintendent of Police (Teacher Employment Cell), Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshuman Jaipuriyar, Adv. Mr. Anukriti Jaipuriyar, Adv. Mr. Rajanikant Kumar, For Respondent no. 8 Mr. S.K. Ranjan, Adv. For Vigilance Mr. Anil Singh, Adv. For State Mr. U.N. Dubey, AC to GP-27

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶19

5 13-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

In view of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of

¶21

the respondent no. 9, petitioner is ready to file an appeal before the District Appellate Authority within four weeks from today along with all supporting documents and the District Appellate Authority is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.7546 of 2021(5) dt.13-08-2024 2/2

¶23

after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with expeditiously.

¶24

The delay, if any, shall be condoned by the District Appellate Authority because the writ petition was pending before this Court since 2021.

¶25

Accordingly, this application is disposed of.

¶26

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶27

devendra/-

¶28

Umashankar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umashankar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivam Bharadwaj Vs The State of Bihar

Mrityunjay Prasad Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Jeetendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary

Bharti Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Vibha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar