Disposed

Dr. Ramamand v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Mar 2024CWJC/7540/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Associate Professor sought mandamus for unpaid differential salary after promotion. Petitioner sought liberty to approach respondents; liberty granted. Court directed him to file detailed representation with documents before Registrar, BN Mandal University within two weeks; Registrar to decide with personal hearing by reasoned speaking order in eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file representation; Registrar to decide differential salary claim by reasoned speaking order within eight weeks.

Dr. Ramamand Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7540 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Ramamand Son of Late Kalanand Sada, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, S.N.S.R.K.S. College, Saharsa, Presently Residing at Annapurna Bhawan, Gangjala, Ward No. 18, P.S. and District- Saharsa.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar.

¶10

The Vice-Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura

¶11

The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra, SC-16 Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

Date : 20-03-2024

¶17

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶18

By filing the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ preferably in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents concerned to make payment of due amount of differential salary which is due as the petitioner was promoted but the differential salary was not paid to him till date without any valid reason.

¶19

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.7540 of 2023 dt.20-03-2024 2/2

¶21

respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶22

The petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura (respondent no. 6) along with all supporting documents within a period of two weeks and the respondent no.6 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

¶23

It is made clear that respondent no.6 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

¶24

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

divyanshi/-

¶27

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	22.03.2024
Transmission Date	NA

Dr. Ramamand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Ramamand v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Kaushal Kishore Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Mishra and Anr. Vs The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University and Ors.

Birju Basfor @ Briju Basfor Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rambha Devi Vs the State of Bihar