Disposed

Shyam Sunder Maheshwari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2024CWJC/6186/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the District Collector to constitute a committee including the DLRAO to survey the disputed land and review the compensation amount extended to the petitioner within four months.

What did the court decide?

Directed District Collector to constitute a committee with DLRAO to survey land and review compensation within four months.

Shyam Sunder Maheshwari Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6186 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shyam Sunder Maheshwari Son of Late Amar Chand Maheshwari Resident of Forbesganj, Marketing Yard Chowk, Ward No.-06, P.S.-Forbesganj, DistrictAraria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Land Acquisition Officer, Araria Bihar.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Araria Bihar.

¶10

DCLR, Araria, Bihar.

¶11

General Manager, National Highways Authority of India, Project Implementation Unit, Araria, Bihar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, S.C.-25 For the N.H.A.I. : Mr. Rajesh Shandilya, Advocate Mr. Vinayak Harshvardhan, Advocate ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 18-03-2024

¶16

Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, learned Counsel for the

¶17

petitioner as also learned State Counsel and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the N.H.A.I.

¶18

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:-

¶19

(i) for a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the compensation due to the petitioner against the acquisition of his land situated at NH-27, the description of which is

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.6186 of 2023(6) dt.18-03-2024 2/3

¶21

Khata No.- 125, Khesra No.- 350, Mauza - Kirkiriya, Ward No. 06 (old) and 08;

¶22

(ii) for imposing a penal interest on the authorities concerned against the amount payable to the petitioner for having delayed the matter pertaining to compensation for such a long period of time.

¶23

3. Affidavits both on behalf of the N.H.A.I as also the State are on record and as per the District Land Acquisition Officer, Araria, communication has been made with the N.H.A.I., Darbhanga regarding the payment that has been made to the petitioner for acquisition of 0.2 decimal of land relating to Khata No. -125, Khesra No.- 350, Thana No. - 151 under Mauza- Kirkichiya in the District of Araria.

¶24

4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it is closer to the toll plaza that is functioning on the N.H.-27 and as such, minuscule amount has been calculated for compensation which has to be re-looked. However, he is unable to clarify whether the same amount has been extended to other farmers whose land has been acquired or he has been singled out.

¶25

5. In that background, instead of keeping the case

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.6186 of 2023(6) dt.18-03-2024 3/3

¶27

pending, it would be appropriate that the District Collector, Araria be directed to constitute a committee to get the land in question surveyed through a committee constituted by him and the committee must include the District Land Acquisition Officer, Araria who shall submit a report on the compensation amount that has been extended to the petitioner and/or whether it needs a review.

¶28

6. Entire exercise must be completed within a period of four months from the date the petitioner submits the representation.

¶29

7. C.W.J.C. No. 6186 of 2023 stands disposed of.

¶30

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶31

Neha/-

¶32

Shyam Sunder Maheshwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Sunder Maheshwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sidheshwar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through the Secretary

Chhathiya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mankeshwar Shukla Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janak Kishore Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Kunwar, Vs The State of Bihar