Disposed

Suman Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jul 2024CWJC/5993/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in a writ petition concerning compassionate appointment directed the District Education Officer to consider the petitioner's representation within ten weeks after an opportunity of hearing, directing her to file necessary documents within two weeks, with consequences for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to file a representation before the District Education Officer within two weeks and directed the District Education Officer to dispose of it within ten weeks after an opportuni

Suman Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5993 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Suman Kumari Daughter of Late Godhan Sah Resident of Village - Chhaukiya, P.S. - Ratnakar, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, District - Vaishali.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Bihar Through its Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director, Primary Education (Education Department), Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

¶8

The District Magistrate, Vaishali

¶9

The District Education Officer, Vaishali

¶10

The District Programme Officer (Establihsment), Vaishali

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Raghopur, Vaishali

¶12

The Block Education Officer, Raghopur, Vaishali

¶13

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Saraipur, Raghopur, Vaishali.

¶14

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Saraipur, Raghopur, Vaishali.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.J.K. Roy 1, SC 13 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 16-07-2024 Heard the parties.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner was a Panchayat Teacher and he died in harness on 19/07/2016. Petitioner applied for compassionate appointment but his application was rejected on the ground that she is not B.tet qualified.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State fairly submits that as per the Government policy, deponents of the deceased, in case of not

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.5993 of 2021(3) dt.16-07-2024 2/2

¶22

possessing eligibility criteria, shall be recruited against Class-III & Class-IV post as per their requisite qualification.

¶23

Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no.4/ District Education Officer, Vaishali, within a period of two weeks’ along with a copy of this order and other documents in support of her claim. The respondent no.4 shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of ten weeks’ after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking and reasoned order in the light of memo no.888 dated 27/08/2021.

¶24

It is made clear that the respondent no.4 shall be held responsible non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

shikha/-

¶27

Suman Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarun Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bimal Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Vikal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Khwaja Garib Nawaz School of Nursing, Said Nagar, Lehariasarai, Darbhanga through its Secretary Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.