Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn at the request of the petitioner's counsel and disposed of accordingly; no substantive issue decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5467 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratnakar Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad, G.P.-14 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
petitioners submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Mosmat Koyali
Prem Lal Ray
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Katihar
The Additional Collector Land Ceiling, Katihar
The Dy. Collector, Land Reforms, Katihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
