On 15-01-2024, the High Court of Patna, in a second consecutive occasion, dismissed an application for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent while the State was represented by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5430 of 2016
======================================================
Sharwan Kumar Son of Late Krishna Mahto resident of village - Dhandhwa, P.S. Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : N o n e For the State : Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA-12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
nobody appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the State is present.
3. It appears that learned counsel for the petitioner has
lost interest in pursuing this matter.
4. This application stands dismissed for non-
Patna High Court CWJC No.5430 of 2016(5) dt.15-01-2024 2/2
prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U
Sharwan Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
