Disposed

Reliance Cement Company Private Ltd., v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2024CWJC/5401/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a conditional stay of tax recovery under the Bihar GST Act due to the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was required to deposit 20% of the remaining disputed tax amount. The stay was linked to the obligation to file an appeal within a specified period once the Tribunal is constituted.

What did the court decide?

Stay of recovery granted subject to deposit of 20% of remaining disputed tax amount; bank attachments to be released.

Reliance Cement Company Private Ltd., Vs The State of Bihar — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5401 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Reliance Cement Company Private Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered Office at Industry House, 2nd Floor, 159 Church Gate, Mumbai 400002 and Branch Office at Ashiana Tower Third Floor, Exhibition Road through its authorized Signatory Anupam Tripathy (aged about 44 Years) Son of Prabhanjan Tripathi resident of 9/A, Central Avenue, Near D.A.V. School, Ward No. 10, Nandini Nagar, Ahiwara, Durg, Chhattisgarh-490036 at present residing at 304 Ashiana Tower, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Commisioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its Office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

¶7

Addl. Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central Division, Patna.

¶8

Dy. Commissioner of State Tax, Special Circle Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondents

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶14

Date : 24-04-2024

¶15

The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs.

¶16

The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal" ) under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").

¶17

However, due to non-constitution of the Tribunal ,

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.5401 of 2022 dt.24-04-2024 2/4

¶19

the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy under SubSection (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act.

¶20

Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under Sub-section (8) of Section 112.

¶21

The respondent State authorities have acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only after the date on which the President, or the State President, as the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.

¶22

This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of the instant writ petition in the following terms:-

¶23

(i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to the amount deposited earlier under

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.5401 of 2022 dt.24-04-2024

¶25

3/4

¶26

Sub-Section (6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to nonconstitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022 .

¶27

(ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the statutory amount, however in the opinion of this Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since order is being passed due to non-constitution of the Tribunal by the respondent-Authorities, the petitioner would be required to present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted and made functional and the President or the State President may enter office. The appeal would be required to be filed observing the statutory requirements after coming into existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating consideration of the appeal.

¶28

(iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the Tribunal within the period which may be specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law.

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.5401 of 2022 dt.24-04-2024 4/4

¶30

(iv) If the above order is complied with and a sum equivalent to 20 per cent of the remaining amount of the tax in dispute is paid then, if there is any attachment of the bank account of the petitioner pursuant to the demand, the same shall be released.

¶31

With the above liberty, observation and directions,

¶32

the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶33

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶34

( Harish Kumar, J)

¶35

rohit/-

¶36

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	25.04.2024
Transmission Date

Reliance Cement Company Private Ltd., v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance Cement Company Private Ltd., v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Rajesh Kumar Dubey Vs The Union of India

Ratan Kumar Singh, Vs Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise

Sonalal Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University Vs Dr. Devendra Singh