Mintu Kumari Devi v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Mar 2024CWJC/5257/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mintu Kumari Devi; Siwan; Devaria; education department respondents; similar benefits; squarely covered; disposed of in terms of; Rhituraj Saraubh L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 judgment dated 18.04.2018; Chandra Shekhar Azad C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 order dated 11.05.2018; Memo No. 2511 dated 11.08.2018 Annexure-13 quashed; eight weeks; writ petition allowed; Patna High Court; Anjani Kumar Sharan; 04-03-2024; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of in terms of the judgments in L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 (Rhituraj Saraubh) and C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 (Chandra Shekhar Azad); respondents directed to grant similar benefits to the petitioner within eight weeks; Memo No. 2511 dated 11.08.2018 (Annexure-13) quashed. ¶¶23

Mintu Kumari Devi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the same benefits as granted under the Division Bench judgment in L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 (Rhituraj Saraubh) and the Single Bench order in C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 (Chandra Shekhar Azad), such that the present case is squarely covered by those decisions.

¶¶21

Court's answer

The present case is squarely covered by the judgment in L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 (Rhituraj Saraubh) and the order in C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 (Chandra Shekhar Azad), and the writ petition is disposed of in terms of those decisions.

¶¶23

Ratio / Principle

The respondents are directed to grant similar benefits to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

¶¶23

Key takeaways

Memo No. 2511 dated 11.08.2018 (Annexure-13) is quashed and the writ petition is allowed.ratio¶¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.), oral judgment dated 04-03-2024 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5257 of 2019 (Mintu Kumari Devi v. The State of Bihar & Ors.): With learned counsel for the parties agreeing that the case was squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment dated 18.04.2018 in L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 (The State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Rhituraj Saraubh and Anr.) and the Single Bench order dated 11.05.2018 in C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 (Chandra Shekhar Azad and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Anr.), the Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of those decisions, directed the respondents to grant similar benefits to the petitioner within eight weeks of receipt/production of a copy of the order, quashed Memo No. 2511 dated 11.08.2018 (Annexure-13), and allowed the writ petition. NAFR.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5257 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mintu Kumari Devi D/o Late Uddhav Sharma Resident of Ram Gulam Rai, P.G.College, Bankata Shiv, P.S.Sallahpur, Devaria, District Siwan

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar and Ors Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Siwan

¶10

The District Education Officer, Siwan

¶11

The District Programme Officer (est.), Siwan

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Darauli, Siwan

¶13

The Block Education Extension Officer, Darauli, Siwan

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar(AC to Gp20)

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-03-2024

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶21

Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the present case is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench dated 18.04.2018, passed in L.P.A. No. 1472 of 2015 (The State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Rhituraj Saraubh and Anr.) and the order of the Single Bench of this Court dated 11.05.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8963 of 2018 (Chandra Shekhar Azad and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Anr.).

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.5257 of 2019 dt.04-03-2024 2/2

¶23

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court passed in the Case of Rhituraj Saraubh & Ors. ( supra ) and the order of the Single Bench of this Court in the case of Chandra Shekhar Azad & Ors. ( supra ) and the respondents are directed to grant similar benefits to the petitioner within period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, Memo No. 2511 dated 11.08.2018 (Annexure-13) is hereby quashed and the writ petition is allowed.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

anand/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	12.03.2024
Transmission Date	NA

Mintu Kumari Devi v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mintu Kumari Devi v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Butan Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Professor Ram Mohan Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Sumant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar