Allowed

Ajay Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC16 Jan 2024CWJC/5117/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order pertains to a writ petition where the petitioner sought permission to represent his case before an authority. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation and mandated the respondent to pass a reasoned order within 90 days if a prior similar case was covered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to file representation; Respondent directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order within 90 days.

Ajay Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5117 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

Ajay Kumar Sinha

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶7

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal Sc4, Adv Mr. M.N. Roy, Adv ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 16-01-2024

¶10

Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State

¶11

present.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the similarly situated matter, this Hon'ble Court has decided one case vide order dated 24.11.2019 passed in C.W. J.C. No. 14952 of 2009 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered from the said order

¶13

Counsel further submits that the clause 4(C) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011 clearly states that in similarly situated cases similar types of order may be passed.

¶14

Counsel for state submits that the petitioner seeks permission to represent his case before the authority as it is covered under the order passed by this Court which is Annexure-4 and he has no objection for the same.

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.5117 of 2018(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/2

¶16

In this background, let this petition be disposed off directing the petitioner to avail his remedy by way of filing representation. If upon considering the case of the petitioner, if respondent authorities finds that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered under the order passed by this Court which is attached as Annexure-4 then similar treatment be made with the petitioner as well.

¶17

Respondent No. 2 is directed to pass reasoned and speaking order on representation filed by the petitioner within 90 days from the date of production of this order.

¶18

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶19

Sunnykr/-

¶20

Ajay Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Vinita Kumari Alias Vinita Devi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Yogendra Rai and Ors. Vs Sakal Rai and Ors.

Anju Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Jayshree Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhinish Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar