Shakti Trading v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; oral order; no merits adjudicated. Petitioner: Shakti Trading through proprietor Shiv Shakti (counsel: Nagendra Prasad Yadav No.1). Respondents: State of Bihar; Commissioner, Saran Division; District Election Officer-cum-District Magistrate, Saran (counsel: Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3); Election Commission of India (counsel: Siddhartha Prasad). Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy. Case: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5084 of 2024; decision date 06-08-2024. No statutes cited; no cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Having regard to learned counsel for the petitioner's submission that the cause does not survive, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous; no substantive adjudication was undertaken on any merits. ¶¶15