Kaushalya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar , Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kr Singh AAg 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 02-01-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶16

This writ application has been filed for directing the respondents to prepare the award in the favour of petitioner and to make payment of compensation amount for land acquired for construction of Punpun Main Canal in Mauza- Barheta appertaining to Khata No. 2, Khesra No. 468, area 69 decimal.

¶17

3 . At the outset, learned counsel for the State refers to the paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent No. 5, and submits that a title appeal is still pending with respect to the land in question since 1979.

¶18

In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter in its extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.5069 of 2016(5) dt.02-01-2024 2/2

¶20

This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before appropriate authority for payment of compensation as may be available to her in accordance with law.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Koushik/-

¶23

U

Kaushalya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaushalya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Meenu Mumtaz and Anr. Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Vivekanand Jha @ Bivekanand Jha @ Sudhir Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bharat Bhushan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Sah @ Surendra Prasad Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Safik Ansari, Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar