Disposed

Baby Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2024CWJC/4707/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition as premature because the petitioner failed to file a prior demand before the competent authority for release of a seized vehicle seized under excise laws. The Court directed the respondents to decide any subsequent application under Rule 12A of the Excise Rules within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as premature. Direction issued to respondent authority to decide application under Rule 12A within two weeks of receipt.

Baby Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4707 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Baby Devi Daughter of Dayanand Ray, resident of village - Punaichak Road L B S Nagar, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, District - Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar.

¶7

The District Magistrate- cum-Collector, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

¶8

The Assistant Excise Commissioner, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

¶9

The Superintendent of Excise, P.S.- Kumhrar, Patna.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

¶11

The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

¶12

... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader 27

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and

¶18

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY

¶19

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶20

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

¶21

Date : 18-03-2024

¶22

In the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for the

¶23

following relief/reliefs:

¶24

“i. for release of Hero Honda motor-

¶25

cycle bearing its registration no. BR-01CM4320 of the petitioner which has been got seized in connection with Danapur p.s. case no. 1090/2022 register for the offences punishable u/s 30 (a) of

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.4707 of 2024 dt.18-03-2024

¶27

2/3

¶28

Bihar Prohibition and Excise act 2016 on 12-102022 sized for the alleged violation of excise law and

¶29

ii. For Also For Restraining The Respondent Authorities For Completion Of Confiscation Proceeding Against Petitioner Two wheeler Vehicle Bearing Its Registration No. BR01CM 4320, sized in connection with Danapur p.s. Case No. 1090/2022.

¶30

iii. Also for any other relief / reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.”

¶31

2. For issuance of writ of mandamus there must be demand before the competent authority followed by statutory duty vested in the public authority. Ingredient No. 1 relating to demand before the competent authority is not forthcoming in the present lis . Accordingly, present writ petition stands disposed of as premature.

¶32

3. Disposal of the present writ petition would not be a hurdle for the petitioner to approach the concerned authority under Rule 12 A of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read with amended sub Rule (2) of Rule 12 A in the year 2022 and 2023. If such application is submitted in the prescribed format, the concerned authority is hereby directed to proceed to decide the

¶33

Patna High Court CWJC No.4707 of 2024 dt.18-03-2024 3/3

¶34

petitioner’s case within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application under Rule 12 A.

¶35

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

¶36

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶37

GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.03.2024 Transmission Date NA

Baby Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baby Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority through its Managing Director, Vs M/S Sree Masala Udyog Industrial Area, Purnea

Rampravesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Patna ,Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Rabindra Kumar Sinha Vs The Union of India

Ankesh Kumar Alias Ankesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar