Disposed

Raman Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2024CWJC/4687/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought payment of dues on grounds similar to petitioners in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016. Court disposed of the writ by directing filing of a representation with officials, who must decide it with a reasoned order in light of that earlier order and pay admitted dues.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file a detailed representation; respondents 5 and 6 to consider it with personal hearing, pass reasoned order per L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 within eight weeks and pay admitted dues.

Raman Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4687 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Raman Kumar Jha Son of Late Harsh Nath Jha, Resident of Village - Bhoj Paraul, Police Station - Rahika, District - Madhubani.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Special Director, Secondary Education (Incharge Sanskrit), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

¶11

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Madhubani.

¶12

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

¶13

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hemant Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 05-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

counsel for the respondents.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 and analogous cases.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the petitioner stands on similar to that of the petitioners of L.P.A. No.43

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.4687 of 2024(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2

¶21

of 2016, there is no requirement to keep pending the present writ application.

¶22

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, before the respondent nos.5 and 6 within a period of four weeks and the respondent nos.5 and 6 are well advised to consider the case of the petitioners and dispose of the representation of the petitioners after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and in light of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 within eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner and also pay the claim/admitted dues of the petitioner.

¶23

It is made clear that respondent nos.5 and 6 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

pallavi/-

¶26

Raman Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitish Kumar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Mina Kumari @ Mina Devi, Vs The State of Bihar

Amaresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Nath Jha Vs The State of Bihar