Disposed¶54

Ram Bachan Prasad @ Baban Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC1 Aug 2024CWJC/4226/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.4226 of 2017 (decided 01-08-2024, Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.). Keywords: pre-emption; Section 16(3) Bihar Land Ceiling Act, 1961; Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 2019; abatement of pending pre-emption proceedings; Punyadeo Sharma v. Kamla Devi, 2022(1) BLJ 434 (SC); Bihar Land Tribunal B.L.T. Case No. 567 of 2014; Land Ceiling Rev. Case No. 98 of 2010 (Divisional Commissioner, Patna); Additional Collector Rohtas order 18.06.2010; withdrawal of deposited pre-emption amount under section 16; writ disposed of as abated.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of as having abated; pre-emptor permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in terms of section 16 of the Act in accordance with law. ¶54

Ram Bachan Prasad @ Baban Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Writ application disposed of as having abated; pre-emptor permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in terms of section 16 of the Act in accordance with law.

¶54

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner's pre-emption application was maintainable considering the nature of the transferred land — the ground on which the Bihar Land Tribunal dismissed it and which the writ sought to challenge. +1 more

¶29

Ratio / Principle

In view of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the Supreme Court's judgment in Punyadeo Sharma v. Kamla Devi (which held that all pending pre-emption proceedings stand abated, including before the Constitutional Courts), the instant writ application, which arises out of a pre-emption application, stands abated.

¶52

Key takeaways

The pre-emptor is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by him in terms of section 16 of the Act in accordance with law.ratio¶53

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.), CWJC No.4226 of 2017, decided 01-08-2024: The petitioner, whose pre-emption prayer under s.16(3) of the Bihar Land Ceiling Act, 1961 allowed on 24.07.2009 was set aside by the Additional Collector on 18.06.2010, affirmed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna on 10.04.2014/04.06.2014 in Land Ceiling Rev. Case No. 98 of 2010, and whose pre-emption application was thereafter dismissed as not maintainable by the Bihar Land Tribunal on 11.11.2016 in B.L.T. Case No. 567 of 2014, sought quashing of these orders. On the State's submission, and relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Punyadeo Sharma v. Kamla Devi, 2022(1) BLJ 434 (SC) — where it was held that after the 2019 Amendment Act repealed sub-section (3) of Section 16, all pending pre-emption proceedings stand abated, including those before the Constitutional Courts — the Court ordered that the instant application stands abated, permitted the pre-emptor to withdraw the amount deposited in terms of section 16 of the Act, and disposed of the application as having abated.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4226 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Bachan Prasad @ Baban Prasad S/o Late Vishwanath Thakur, resident of village - Budhawal, P.S. Karakat Gorari , Distt. - Rohtas

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Chairman, The Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna

The Divisional Commissioner, Patna

¶12

The Additional Collector, Rohtas

¶13

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bikramganj, Rohtas

¶14

Kalawati Devi, W/o Dwarika Sah, resident of village - Budhawal, P.S. Karakat, Distt. - Rohtas

¶15

Rajeshwar Tiwari, S/o Kailash Tiwari,

¶16

Jitendra Nath Tiwari, Son of Kailash Tiwari, Both resident of village - Budhawal, P.S. Karak, District - Rohtas

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance :

¶20

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Nandan Sahay, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18

¶21

======================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

Date : 01-08-2024

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶25

counsel for the respondents.

¶26

2. In the instant application, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

¶27

“ 1. That the present writ application has been filed for setting aside an order dated 11.11.2016 passed by the Hon’ble Chairman, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 567 of 2014, by which dismissed the application filed by the

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.4226 of 2017 dt.01-08-2024 2/5

¶29

petitioner saying pre-emption application is not maintainable considering the nature of the transferred land. Further setting aside the order dated 10.04.2014/04.06.2014, passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna in land Ceiling Rev. Case No. 98 of 2010 by which he has affirmed the order dated 18.06.2010 passed by the learned Additional Collector by which he has set-aside the order dated 24.07.2009 by which prayer of the petitioner u/s 16(3) of the Bihar Land Ceiling Act, 1961 has been allowed.”

¶30

3. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for

¶31

the respondents-State that in view of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 2019 read with judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Punyadeo Sharma and Ors. Versus Kamla Devi and Ors. reported in 2022(1) BLJ 434 (SC ), the instant application which arises out of pre-emption application stands abated.

¶32

4. Relevant paragraphs of the aforesaid judgment in the case of Punyadeo Sharma (supra) is quoted hereinbelow:

¶33

“ 4. The question examined by the Division Bench of the High Court was whether an application for pre-emption was filed within

¶34

Patna High Court CWJC No.4226 of 2017 dt.01-08-2024 3/5

¶35

three months of the registration as required by Section 16(3) of the Act or was it required to be filed within three months of the day of execution of the sale deed i.e. 9.2.1990. However, the said question does not survive for consideration in view of the subsequent development whereby the right of pre-emption itself has been taken away by the Bihar Act No. 6 of 2019 when the Act was amended. The Amending Act reads thus:

¶36

"The Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 2019

¶37

1. Short title, Extent and Commencement. - (1) This Act may be called The Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 2019.

¶38

(2) It shall extend to the whole of the State of Bihar.

¶39

(3) It shall come into force immediately.

¶40

2. Amendment in Section 16 of the Act, 1961.-

¶41

(1) Sub Section (3) of Section-16 of the said Act is hereby repealed.

¶42

(2) In the Section-16 of the said Act, the following new sub section-(4) shall be added:-

¶43

(4)(i) After the repeal of sub section-(3) of

¶44

Patna High Court CWJC No.4226 of 2017 dt.01-08-2024

¶45

4/5

¶46

Section-16 of this Act, all cases or proceedings pending before the State Government, the Board of Revenue, the Bihar Land Tribunal, the Divisional Commissioner, the Collector, the Additional Collector, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms or in any other Court, shall be deemed to be abated.

¶47

(ii) Pursuant to the repeal of Sub section(3) of Section-16 of this Act, any purchase money together with a sum equal to 10% thereof. already legally deposited shall be refunded, without any interest, to the depositor.

¶48

7. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and find that the right of preemption, after the Amending Act, abates as Sub-section 4(i) is specifically dealing with all pending proceedings before whatsoever forum. Therefore, the right of pre-emption will stand abated on and after 25.2.2019 including the proceedings which were pending before any forum.

¶49

………………………………………………… …12. ...…………………. Any other Court is wide enough to include the Constitutional Courts i.e. the High Court and the Supreme Court……………………………………... Thus, keeping in view the object of the

¶50

Patna High Court CWJC No.4226 of 2017 dt.01-08-2024 5/5

¶51

Statute, purpose to be achieved and the express language of the Amending Act, all proceedings of pre-emption under the Act pending before any authority under the Act or before any Court shall stand abated.

¶52

13. Consequently, the present appeals are allowed. The entire pre-emption proceedings stand abated. It shall be open to the respondents to withdraw 10% of the amount deposited by them in terms of Section 16 of the Act in accordance with law." (Emphasis Supplied) 5. In view of the above, it is ordered that the instant application stands abated.

¶53

6. It is further directed that in terms of the aforesaid order, it shall be open to the pre-emptor herein to withdraw the amount deposited by him in terms of section 16 of the Act in accordance with law.

¶54

7. The application stands disposed of as having abated.

¶55

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶56

Alok Verma/-

¶57

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	09.08.2024
Transmission Date	N/A

Ram Bachan Prasad @ Baban Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bachan Prasad @ Baban Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md.Atullah Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nand Kishore Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Doli Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramjee Singh Vs Kabitri Devi and Ors.