Petitioners sought writ relief in a land/revenue matter before the Patna High Court. After argument, senior counsel sought liberty to pursue an appropriate civil suit. The court granted permission and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3639 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
the State counsel.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3639 of 2023(8) dt.11-03-2024 2/2
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' grievance could be redressed in the writ petition or required recourse to a civil suit.
Md. Zulfikar Ali
Ahbab Alam
Md. Meraj Alam
Md. Rahi @ Rahi
Md. Jamal Asfani
Md. Shakil
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
