Neeta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Withdrawal of writ petition; writ application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law. Patna High Court, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case (CWJC) No.3622 of 2024, decided 21-11-2024 by Justice Satyavrat Verma (single bench, oral order). Petitioner: Neeta Kumari (village Patanawa, P.S. Indrapuri, district Rohtas at Sasaram). Respondents: State of Bihar, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Divisional Commissioner Patna, District Magistrate and District Land Acquisition Officer Rohtas at Sasaram, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board (Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor, Rohtas). Counsel: Awnish Kumar for petitioner; Government Pleader-23 for respondent(s); counsel for the Railways unnamed. No statutes cited; no cases cited; no monetary amounts.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law.