Disposed¶28

Anuradha Kumari, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2024CWJC/3322/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.3322 of 2020 (Anuradha Kumari and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.), decided 25-06-2024 by Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.; writ application concerning respondents in Education Department/Panchayat Niyojan Unit, Lakhisarai/Chanan Block; disposed of as not pressed on ground that grievance redressed during pendency; permission to withdraw granted; no ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ application; the writ application was disposed of as not pressed. ¶28

Anuradha Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3322 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anuradha Kumari, wife of Prabhu Narayan Mishra, resident of Khaitan Bhawan, Main road, near Dharamsala, Ward No. 14, P.S. and Distt. - Lakhisarai.

¶4

Seema Kumari, wife of Yogendra Rajak, resident of village- Sahur, P.S. - Surajgarha, Distt.- Lakhisarai.

¶5

Surendra Kumar, son of Shivbalak Saw, resident of Ward No. 07, Ganaga Sarai, P.S. and Distt.- Lakhisarai.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

¶11

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

¶12

The District Programme Officer, Education Deptt. Lakhisarai.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Chanan Block Distt- Lakhisarai.

¶14

The Block Education Officer, Chanan, Lakhisarai.

¶15

Panchayat Niyojan Unit-cum-Gram Panchayat Raj, Lakhochak, Chanan, Lakhisarai through the Panchayat Secretary.

¶16

The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Niyojan Unit- cum-Gram Panchayat Raj, Lakhochak, Chanan, Lakhisarai.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr.Jai Prabhat Kishore, A.C. to S.C.-13 ======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶21

3 25-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶22

counsel for the State.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

¶24

during the pendency of the writ application, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed, therefore, he does not

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.3322 of 2020(3) dt.25-06-2024 2/2

¶26

want to press the writ application.

¶27

Permission is granted.

¶28

Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as

¶29

not pressed.

¶30

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶31

divyanshi/-

¶32

Anuradha Kumari, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuradha Kumari, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Purushottam Prakash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Narendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary

Shailesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Archana Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumari @ Suman Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Smita Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar