The petitioner submitted that the sale deed was registered by the SubRegistrar, Gaya Sadar, redressing her grievance. Consequently, the High Court disposed off the writ petition without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3161 of 2020
======================================================
Ruma Sharma Wife of Ranjan Ravi Resident of House No. 692, Road No.12, Magadh Colony, P.O. Chandauti, P.S. Magadh Medical, District- Gaya, Bihar823001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad (Gp7) Mrs. Manisha Singh, AC to GP-7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
ORAL ORDER
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
fairly submits that the grievance of the petitioner has stood redressed during the interregnum period and the sale deed in question has also been registered by the office of the SubRegistrar, Gaya Sadar, hence the present writ petition be disposed off.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3161 of 2020(3) dt.27-11-2024 2/2
disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
kanchan/-
U
Ruma Sharma
The State of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
