Disposed¶16

Keshav Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Dec 2024CWJC/2366/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keshav Mishra v. State of Bihar; Patna High Court; Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2366 of 2017; decided 19-12-2024 by Justice Mohit Kumar Shah; boundary wall allegedly illegally demolished at Village Naraipur, Bagaha, West Champaran; legal action sought against Collector cum District Magistrate, West Champaran and Circle Officer, Bagaha; State's counter affidavit (para 13): no encroachment proceedings by Circle Officer, Bagaha-II, no demolition; no rejoinder affidavit filed; writ petition disposed of with liberty to pursue alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law in case of any subsisting grievances. ¶16

Keshav Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2366 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Keshav Mishra Son of Late Bishwa Mohan Mishra, resident of VillageNaraipur, P.O. and P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Collector cum District Magistrate, West Champaran.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Bagaha, P.O. and P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Madan Mohan, Adv. Mr. Ritik Shah, Adv. Mr. Saurav Suman, Adv. For the State : Mr. Navnit Kumar, AC to GP-18 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 19-12-2024 Though the present writ petition has been filed for taking legal action against the Respondents No. 4 and 5 and construct the boundary wall of the petitioner, which has been illegally demolished, however, the learned counsel for the Respondent-State has submitted, by referring to paragraph no. 13 of the counter affidavit filed in the present case that as per the records, neither any encroachment proceedings were ever initiated by the Circle Officer, Bagaha-II, nor the boundary wall of the petitioner was ever demolished, hence, the present writ petition is bereft of any merit.

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.2366 of 2017(5) dt.19-12-2024 2/2

¶16

This Court finds that the aforesaid stand taken by the Respondents in their counter affidavit has not been rebutted by the petitioner, inasmuch as no rejoinder affidavit has been filed, hence, I deem it fit and proper to dispose off the present writ petition, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law in case of any subsisting grievances.

¶17

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶18

Ajay/- U

Keshav Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Keshav Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abdul Kalam Dafali Vs The State of Bihar

Anandi Prasad Gupta Vs The Union of India

Raj Kumar Mishra Vs Sri Awadhesh Mishra and Ors.

Vimala Tiwari @ Vimala Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kari Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.