Disposed¶34

Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Feb 2024CWJC/2188/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shiksha Mitra appointment dispute; petitioner's higher-marks claim versus respondent No. 11 Ram Bharos Prasad; Jamuawan/Jamunawan Gram Panchayat, Primary School Khusialpur, Khijarsarai/Karpi, Gaya, Bihar; State Appellate Authority Token No. Appeal/583/2017 order 20.12.2017; District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority Gaya order 29.02.2012 dismissing appeal as time-barred; direction to dispose of representation within six months; writ disposed, not decided on merits; Patna High Court CWJC No. 2188 of 2019; Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation, if filed, within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order. ¶34

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2188 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjay Kumar S/o- Birendra kumar Sinha R/o- Village Chhotia, Post Office Takia Karpi, P.S. Khijarsarai, Dist- Gaya

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority Gaya

¶9

The District Magistrate Gaya

¶10

The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Vijaypur-cum-Executive Officer, Employment Unit Khijarsarai Block, Dist-Gaya

¶12

The Block Education Officer Khijarsarai, Gaya

¶13

The Secretary Jamunawan Gram Panchayat, Gaya

¶14

The Mukhia, Jamuawan Gram Panchyat, Police Station-Khijarsarai, Gaya Gaya

¶15

The Panchayat Sevak Jamuawan Gram Panchyat, P.s.-Khijarsarai, Gaya

¶16

Ram Bharos Prasad Son of Harihar Prasad R/o- Village Sahwajpur, P.O. Takia, P.s.-Karpi, Gaya

¶17

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ritika Rani, Adv. For the State : Mr. Narendra Kumar AC to GP-20 For the Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr.Adv.

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶20

Date : 13-02-2024

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

The present application has been filed for the

¶23

following reliefs:

¶24

(i) For quashing the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by Chairperson, State Appellate Authority, Bihar in Token No. Appeal /583/2017 as contained in

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.2188 of 2019 dt.13-02-2024 2/3

¶26

Annexure-12 by which the State Appellate Authority has dismissed the appeal.

¶27

(ii) Also for quashing the office order vide Memo No. 98 dated 29.02.2012 passed in Case No. 68/11, by the Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Gaya as contained in Annexure-10 by which appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed on the ground of time barred.

¶28

(iii) Also for quashing the part of the letter dated 23^rd May, 2005 issued under the signature of the Mukhiya and the Secretary of Jamuawan Gram panchayat in the District of Gaya, as contained in Annexure-4 whereby and whereunder Respondent No. 11 Ram Bharos Prasad has been appointed as Shiksha Mitra in Primary School, Khusialpur, under Jamuawan Gram Panchayat.

¶29

(iv) Also for any other necessary direction, including appointment to the petitioner on that post of Shiksha Mitra under Jamuawan Gram Panchayat to which petitioner is legally entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

¶31

though petitioner has higher marks than respondent no. 11 but the petitioner was not employed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. He

¶32

Patna High Court CWJC No.2188 of 2019 dt.13-02-2024 3/3

¶33

further submitted that the petitioner had filed representation before the District Appellate Authority where the prayer of the petitioner was dismissed. Thereafter, he filed appeal before the State Appellate Authority which was also dismissed.

¶34

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation, if filed, within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶35

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶36

devendra/-

¶37

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	16.02.2024
Transmission Date	NA

Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Ray @ Ravindra Prasad Ray Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Naresh Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shaista Anum Vs The State of Bihar

Rita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Anil kumar sinha and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.