A writ petition challenging a BPCL tender notice was dismissed as infructuous because tenders were allotted to third parties long ago.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19785 of 2016
======================================================
Arbind Kumar S/o Late Gorakh Tiwary Resident of Village-Sherpur, P.O.MIC Bela, P.S.-Sadar, District-Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the BPCL : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
respondent that the matter has become infructuous.
Writ petition is filed to quash and set aside the tender notice dated 15.11.2016 issued by the respondentManager, Operation In-charge of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Muzaffarpur.
parties long ago. Therefore, the Writ petition is
Patna High Court CWJC No.19785 of 2016(2) dt.11-11-2024 2/2
dismissed as infrucutuous.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Manishkr/-
U
Arbind Kumar S/o Late Gorakh Tiwary
The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The Regional Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation, Bihar, Patna
The Manager, Operation Incahrge Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
