Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ application before any substantive adjudication. The High Court accorded permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1854 of 2024
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Minu Kumari, Advocate For the State : Sri Anirban Kundu, SC-24 For Respondent No.8 : Sri Sunil Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
permission to withdraw this application.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1854 of 2024(2) dt.02-02-2024 2/2
withdrawn.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Bhuntun Kumar
Krishna Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna
The Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna
The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Jehanabad
K. Vinod Chandran
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
