Pratik Raj Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17791 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pratik Raj S/o Randhir Kumar, Resident of Village - Arap, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Govt. of Bihar.

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna.

¶8

The Addtional Collector, Patna.

¶9

The Circle Officer, Bikram, District- Patna.

¶10

Dinesh Singh, S/o Rajeshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Arap, P.S.Bikram, District- Patna.

¶11

Nageshwar Singh, S/o Late Shiv Bihari Singh Resident of Village- Arap, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.

¶12

Ram Kumar Singh, S/o Kapildeo Singh Resident of Village- Arap, P.S.Bikram, District- Patna.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Advocate Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Advocate Mr. Shashank Kashyap, Advocate Mr.Nawnit Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, AC to AAG-4 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 28-08-2024 The present writ petition has been filed

¶17

seeking the following reliefs:-

¶18

“1. To issue a writ of Mandamus commanding respondent authorities 1^st set particularly respondent Circle Officer to initiate the proceedings afresh in Land Encroachment Case No. 01/2014-15 initiated against Respondent 2^nd set who have

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.17791 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2024 2/3

¶20

encroached Aam Rasta appertaining to Khata No. 172, Kheshra No. 1695, area 09 decimal which is in the nature of Gairmajarua Malik and as per Khatiyan it is Gairmajarua Aam which is situated in VillageArap, P.S. Bikram, District-Patna or initiate a fresh encroachment proceeding against encroachers for removal of encroachment from the land in question.

¶21

(ii) Further for direction to the respondent 1^st set to take coercive action against respondent 2^nd set for removal of encroachment which has been again encroached by respondent 2^nd set appertaining to Khata No. 172, Khesra No. 1695, Area- 09 decimal which is in the nature of Gairmazarua Malik and as per Khatiyan it is Gairmajarua Aam.”

¶22

At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the encroachment in question has already stood removed, however, the same is disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, hence he seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.17791 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2024 3/3

¶24

approach the District Magistrate, Patna for the purposes of making an enquiry as to whether the encroachment in question has resurfaced or not and then taking appropriate steps. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶25

It is needless to state that in case the petitioner approaches the District Magistrate, Patna by filing appropriate petition, the District Magistrate, Patna shall forthwith make enquiry into the matter and in case it is found that the encroachment in question has resurfaced, he shall take recourse to the due process of law for the purposes of removal of the same.

¶26

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

¶27

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶28

S.Sb/-

¶29

U

Pratik Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratik Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Bhagwan Jee Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Munilal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jageshwar Yadav and Anr. Vs Shrimati Jhalia Devi and Ors.

Nawal Kishor Singh @ Nawalkishor Hardeo Singh Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Maurya Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Rajdeo Ray Vs The State of Bihar