Sandhya Devi v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: No Confidence Motion; Pramukh; Up-Pramukh; Block Panchayat Samiti, Dhaka; East Champaran, Motihari; requisition dated 30.12.2023; Letter dated 04.01.2024 (Letter No. 03); Letter dated 12.01.2024 (Memo No. 478); Director, Panchayati Raj Department; District Magistrate; special meeting dated 08.01.2024; Kishan Bhawan Sabhagar; Section 44(3)(ii) Bihar Panchayati Raj Act 2006; Section 44 Bihar Panchayati Raj Act 2006; Section 10 Bihar Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act 2015; one no-confidence motion per tenure; voting among members present; L.P.A. No. 113 of 2020 Dharamsila Kumari vs. Hemant Kumar paragraphs 58-59; CWJC No. 911 of 2024 order dated 16.01.2024; certiorari; natural justice; writ disposed; Purnendu Singh, J.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari to follow the principle laid down in L.P.A. No. 113 of 2020 (Dharamsila Kumari vs. Hemant Kumar & Ors.), specially paragraphs 58 and 59, and to direct voting among the elected members present on the date fixed for the special meeting of the No Confidence Motion in accordance with Section 44 of the Bihar Panchayati Raj Act, 2006; State counsel directed to communicate the order to all State respondents forthwith.