Disposed

Md.Shah Jahan v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Aug 2024CWJC/1622/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought to restrain Kishanganj authorities from demolishing the petitioner's house. Respondents stated no encroachment proceedings had been initiated and no demolition notice issued. Petitioner conceded the writ was misconceived; the court disposed of it with liberty to approach authorities for subsisting grievances.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach respondent authorities regarding any subsisting grievance.

Md.Shah Jahan Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1622 of 2008

¶2

======================================================

¶3

MD.SHAH JAHAN, son of late Md. Idris, resident of Mohalla Khagra, P.S. Town and District-Kishanganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Collector, Kishanganj

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kishanganj

¶9

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Kishanganj

¶10

The Circle Officer, Kishanganj

¶11

The Executive Officer, Kishanganj Municipality Kishanganj

¶12

The Kishanganj Municipality through its Executive Officer, Kishanganj.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Najmul Hoda, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Mrs. Sunita Kumari, AC to AAG-13 For the Nagar Parishad : Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Adv. ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

7 08-08-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-

¶18

“1. That this writ application is for restraining the Respondent authorities from dispossessing the petitioner from the house in question by demolishing the house.”

¶19

At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Executive Officer, Kishanganj Nagar Parishad, submits, by referring to the counter affidavit filed in the present case that neither any encroachment proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner nor any notice has been issued by the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.1622 of 2008(7) dt.08-08-2024 2/2

¶21

Kishanganj Municipality to the petitioner nor any staff of the Kishanganj Nagar Parishad has gone to the house of the petitioner to demolish the same, hence, the present writ petition is misconceived.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if that be the case, the present writ petition be disposed off, however, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Respondents in case of any subsisting grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶23

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

¶24

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶25

Ajay/-

¶26

Md.Shah Jahan v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Shah Jahan v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Sahni, Vs The State of Bihar

Umapati Devi Vs The Bihar State Housing Board

Md. Ajad Sah @ Md. Ajad Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Charitra Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.