The High Court at Patna dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 for lack of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear after repeated calls, indicating no interest in continuing the proceedings.
The present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution/non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15525 of 2023
======================================================
Brajesh Paswan S/o Late Devsharan Paswan, R/o Village- Inayatchak Dhansingara, P.S. - Mahkar, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad ( Sc 8 )
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 08-04-2024
Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J
kanchan/- U
Brajesh Paswan
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Director General of Police, Bihar
The Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range
The District Magistrate, Gaya
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
