Writ petition concerning selection of Anganbari Sevika. Counsel for the petitioner stated the reliefs sought had already been redressed, whereupon the court consigned the petition without adjudicating on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1500 of 2015
======================================================
Nitu Singh Wife of Late Baban Kumar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Aurahi Ekparha, P.S, Gamharia, District- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.-2 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc6- Manindra Kishore Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 01-08-2024
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent/State.
petitioner submitted that the relief(s), as sought for in the present writ petition by the petitioner has already been redressed.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
sudhanshu/-
U
Nitu Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Collector, Madhepura
The Project Officer, Madhepura
The Bal Vikas Pariyojna Padadhikari C.D.P.O Madhepura
The Selection Committee for Selection of Anganbari Sevika
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
