Disposed¶21

Pramod Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Sept 2024CWJC/14098/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No. 14098 of 2024; decided 17-09-2024; Anil Kumar Sinha, J.; Matric Trained Pay Scale; Assistant Teacher; completion of three years of initial appointment; representation to District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar; Abdus Samad v. The State of Bihar and Others, C.W.J.C. No. 7322 of 2017 (decided 11.04.2018); writ disposed of with direction to consider representation and grant similar benefit if covered.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent no. 5 (District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar) within three weeks; respondent no. 5 to decide the representation within two months of receipt; if the petitioner's case is covered by Abdus Samad (supra), similar benefit (Matric Trained Pay Scale) shall be granted. ¶21

Pramod Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14098 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pramod Kumar Jha son of Late Bashishtha Narayan Jha, resident of VillagePavitra Nagar, Police Station-Sheohar, District-Sheohar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar .

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Sheohar.

¶10

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar.

¶11

The District Treasury Officer, Sheohar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC 12 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 17-09-2024 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

¶16

The petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to grant Matric Trained Pay Scale to the petitioner upon completion of three years of his initial appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of Abdus Samad v. The State of Bihar and Others (C.W.J.C. No. 7322 of 2017), dated 11.04.2018.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Counsel for the State submits

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.14098 of 2024(2) dt.17-09-2024 2/2

¶20

that the present writ application may be disposed of in terms of Abdus Samad (supra).

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions, the application is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Progamme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar, (respondent no. 5) by filing a representation within a period of three weeks from today, which shall be decided by the respondent no. 5 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation.

¶22

If it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the case of Abdus Samad (supra), then similar benefit shall be granted to the petitioner.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶24

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶25

U √

Pramod Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shila Devi Vs Subashni Devi

Usha Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Md. Rozid @ Md. Rozid Alam @ Rozid Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Yahiya Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Tabbu Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar