Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harshit Griyaghey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Government Pleader 18 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 11-09-2024

¶17

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

¶18

following relief(s):-

¶19

“1(a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter no. 1677 dated 04.07.2024 (Annexure-7) issued by the learned Circle Officer, Maner whereby and where under the petitioner has been directed to remove the encroachment within a period of 10 days otherwise the same will be removed by force and for which the petitioner will have to bear the cost. The respondent authority has issued the impugned notice without taking into consideration that there is no encroachment and it is ancestral dwelling house bearing

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.13885 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 2/4

¶21

Mauza - Maner, Tauzi No. 3127, Khata No. 330, Khesra No. 667, which is recorded in the name of the great grandfather of the petitioner and they are residing therein for the last 100 years. The petitioner is the legal owner and has valid right, title and interest & possession over the said land. The impugned notice is vague inasmuch as it does not indicate any case number and wrong Khata No. 331, Khesra No. 668, Area 440 sq. ft. has been mentioned therein, which has been shown as public passage, with which the petitioner has no concern.

¶22

(b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the office order dated 27.08.2024 (Annexure - 8) issued by the S.D.O. Danapur whereby the police force and JCB machines has been instructed to be present on the date of removal of encroachment, without giving the description of land and the case number.

¶23

(c) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the ex-parte order dated 05.04.2023 and 25.04.2023 (Annexure- 5) passed by the learned Circle Officer, Maner, Patna in encroachment case no. 11 of 2022-23 whereby and where under the land bearing Plot no. 668, Khata No. 331, Mauza - Maner, Thana No. 7, part area 440 sq feet has been declared as encroached and wrongly notice under section 6(2) has been issued to the petitioner to vacate her dwelling house

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.13885 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 3/4

¶25

within a period of fortnight which is situated at Mauza Maner, Tauzi No. 3126, Khata No. 330, Khesra No. 667, without considering the fact that vague notices were issued to the petitioner, no proper opportunity of hearing was granted to her to present her case. The learned Circle officer has passed the impugned order in haste and in malafide manner.

¶26

(d) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to not disturb the dwelling house of the petitioner over which their ancestors have been residing for the last 100 years with valid right, title and interest. The respondent authority be directed to consider that dwelling house can be vacated only in accordance with law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.”

¶27

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final order, which has been passed by the Circle Officer, Maner, Patna on 05.04.2023, under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, in connection with Encroachment Case No. 11 of 2022-23, has already been challenged by the petitioner by filing an appeal, before the District Magistrate, Patna, under Section 11 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, hence some protection is sought, during the interregnum period, in order to enable the petitioner to

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.13885 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 4/4

¶29

obtain interim relief.

¶30

Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondentState submits that in case the aforesaid appeal is still pending consideration, the same would definitely be disposed off, within a stipulated time frame, as is fixed by this Court.

¶31

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to direct the District Magistrate, Patna, Bihar to consider the aforesaid appeal filed by the petitioner and pass a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today and till then no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.

¶32

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

¶33

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶34

Saurav/-

¶35

U

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umeshwarnath Tiwari @ Chotalal Tiwari Vs Udayraj Tiwari and Ors.

Shakuntala Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Kumar Vs Mahendar Prasad and Ors.

Indradev Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rishi Kant Singh and Anr. Vs Mira Devi and Anr.

Dev Ratan Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.