Petitioner sought restoration of encroached land via writ, but the court found it a private dispute not amenable to mandamus and permitted him to approach the Collector.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13569 of 2024
======================================================
Baikunth Bihari Sharan, son of Ramchandra Sharan, resident of Village and P.O.- Katarmala, P.S.- Goraul, District- Vaishali, Bihar- 844114.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.13569 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 2/3
2 19-09-2024 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13569 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 3/3
grievance.
disposed off with the liberty aforesaid.
(Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition lies for restoration of possession in what appears to be a private land dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baikunth Bihari Sharan
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Revenue Land Reforms
The Collector, Muzaffarpur
Sri Kusheshwar Das
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
