Disposed¶26

Vinod Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2024CWJC/13366/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No. 13366 of 2024, Vinod Prasad v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court, Rajiv Roy, J., order dated 05-09-2024): disposed of with liberty to approach the Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran; claim for Rs. 1,20,000/- by retired Panchayat Secretary for Scheme No. 07/2020-21 under Lohia Swachchh Bihar Abhiyan, Community Swatchhta Centre, Kesariya Gram Panchayat; no merits adjudication; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to appear before respondent no. 4 (Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran) for redressal of the grievance; no monetary direction issued and no opinion expressed on merits. ¶26

Vinod Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13366 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vinod Prasad Son of Paras Nath Prasad, Resident of Gidha, Choubey Tola, Police Station - Chanpatia, District- West Champaran (Bettiah).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Department of Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

¶9

The District Magistrate, West Champaran (Bettiah)

¶10

The Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran (Bettiah).

¶11

The District Rural Development Agency, West Champaran (Bettiah).

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran (Bettiah).

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 05-09-2024 Heard the parties.

¶20

The present writ petition has been preferred for the

¶21

following relief(s):

¶22

“for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) to the respondents to release the amount Rs. 1,20,000/- (One lakh twenty thousand) and to ensure the payment of the said amount since the petitioner a retired Panchayat Secretary of R.N.S has already completed the Scheme No. 07/2020-21 relating with Lohia Swachchh Bihar Abhiyan at the villageDhobha of Kesariya Gram Panchayat for

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.13366 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 2/2

¶24

the construction of Community Swatchhta Centre.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to appear before the respondent no. 4, the Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran (Bettiah) for the redressal of the grievance.

¶26

Without commenting anything in the matter and granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶27

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶28

Vijay Singh/-

¶29

Vinod Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Choudhary @ Rohit Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Prakash Singh @ Chunnu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Gupta @ Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Priti Priya Vs The State of Bihar through the Mr. Pratyaya Amrit, Principal Secretary, Health Department