Petitioner approached the Court alleging grievances regarding payments. Learned advocates for the petitioner and respondents informed the Court that the grievance was redressed and all admissible payments were made, rendering the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1328 of 2022
======================================================
Bhaglu Jha
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha (GP 27) For the University : Mr. Ravi Nandan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
9 06-08-2024 Heard the parties.
permission to file a hard copy of the counter affidavit across the Board.
apprised this Court that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.
the statements made in the counter affidavit as well as the supplementary counter affidavit that all the admissible payments
Patna High Court CWJC No.1328 of 2022(9) dt.06-08-2024 2/2
have been made.
stands disposed of having become infructuous.
(Harish Kumar, J)
durgesh/-
U
Bhaglu Jha
The State of Bihar
HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
