Disposed¶32

Saleha Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jan 2024CWJC/13060/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Saleha Khatoon v. State of Bihar; CWJC 13060/2023; Patna High Court; Justice Harish Kumar; widow pension family pension arrears; Bihar Education Service merger 1977; Sub-ordinate Education Service; State Government resolution 11.04.1977; leave encashment; death-cum-retirement benefits; District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna; letter no. 1016 dated 03.11.2023; payment of admissible dues within eight weeks; interest 8 per cent per annum delayed payment recovered from erring officers; Article 226 writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna to ensure payment of the petitioner's admissible dues within eight weeks; entitlement to interest @ 8 per cent per annum on any delayed payment, recoverable from erring officers. ¶32

Saleha Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2024)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶32

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should grant consequential benefits to the petitioner's late husband in terms of the State Government resolution dated 11.04.1977, including merger benefit in Bihar Education Service Class II, benefit of Bihar Education Service Class I, and promotion to the Junior High Grade. +1 more

¶19

Ratio / Principle

Considering the stand taken by respondent no. 3, the Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna to ensure payment of the petitioner's admissible dues, preferably within eight weeks from receipt/production of a copy of the order.

¶28

Key takeaways

If payment of admissible dues is unnecessarily delayed despite the Court's order, the petitioner shall be entitled to interest at 8 per cent per annum on the delayed payment, recoverable from the erring officers.ratio¶31

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna HC (Harish Kumar, J), CWJC No.13060 of 2023, decided 03-01-2024: Widow of a deceased employee (late Kazi Jwadath Hussain) who had been merged from the Sub-ordinate Education Service into the Bihar Education Service (1977) and promoted to Class-I (memo no. 733, 21.06.2018) sought consequential benefits per the State resolution of 11.04.1977 and revision of pension, family pension, leave encashment and DCRG. Respondent no. 3's counter affidavit stated the pay slip had been issued and sent to the District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna (letter no. 1016, 03.11.2023); these facts were not refuted. Court disposed of the petition directing the DPO (Establishment) Patna to ensure payment of admissible dues within eight weeks, with interest @ 8% p.a. on delayed payment recoverable from erring officers.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13060 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Saleha Khatoon Wife of Late Kazi Jwadath Hussain Resident of VillagePaschim Bainan, Bagnan, District-Howrah, State-West Bengal, PIn Code711303, Currently Residing at C/o-kazi Taushif Hussain, A-18 Anand Bihar near I.C.I.C.I. bank, P.O. and P.S.-Anisabad, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Administration-Cum-Additional Secretary, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

¶8

The In-charge, Finance (pay Claim and Fixation Cell) Department, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Patna.

¶10

The Principal of Shaheed Rajendra Prasad Singh, Patna High School, Gardanibnagh, Patna.

¶11

The Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hitesh Suman, Advocate For the AG : Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 03-01-2024 Heard Mr. Md. Sufiyan, learned counsel appearing on

¶16

behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Hitesh Suman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Ms. Ritika Rani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing the present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution, has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.13060 of 2023(4) dt.03-01-2024 2/4

¶19

(i) For issuance of direction the respondents to grant of consequential benefits to the petitioner’s husband in terms of the resolution of the State Government dated 11.04.1977.

¶20

(ii) For issuance of direction to the respondents to provide the consequential benefits of merger to the petitioner’s husband service in Bihar Education Service Class II, thereafter provide the benefit of Bihar Education Service Class I, as well as the benefit of promotion to the Junior High Grade.

¶21

(iii) For issuance of direction to the respondents to pay the difference in account of leave encashment, difference in amount of Death-cum-retirement benefits, revise pension of the petitioner’s husband as well as the family pension of the petitioner on account of change in service condition of petitioner’s husband.

¶22

(iv) For issuance of any other directions/orders as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶23

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3 stating therein that the husband of the petitioner was the member of Sub-ordinate Education Service, but subsequently inducted in Bihar Education Service by way of merger with effect from 1977. He was further promoted to Bihar

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.13060 of 2023(4) dt.03-01-2024 3/4

¶25

Education Service Class-I vide notification, as contained in memo no. 733, dated 21.06.2018. He next submitted that the husband of the petitioner was superannuated on 31.08.1997 and died on 16.03.2011.

¶26

By referring to the averments made in the counter affidavit, further submission has been made that after correspondences to the different authorities, lastly the pay slip of the late husband of the petitioner has been issued and sent to the District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna to ensure payment to the petitioner after completing necessary formalities indicated vide letter no. 1016 order dated 03.11.2023.

¶27

The afore noted facts has not been refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶28

Considering the stand taken by the respondent no. 3, this Court thinks it proper to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the District Program Officer (Establishment) Patna to ensure the payment of admissible dues of the petitioner preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶29

Needless to observe that the petitioner is a hapless widow of erstwhile employee, late Kazi Jwadath Hussain, aged about 77 years. In case, unnecessary delay is made for payment

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.13060 of 2023(4) dt.03-01-2024 4/4

¶31

of admissible dues, despite the order of this Court, the petitioner would be entitled to interest @ 8 per cent per annum over the delayed payment, which shall be recovered from the erring officers.

¶32

This disposes the writ petition.

¶33

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶34

annpurna/-

¶35

Saleha Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saleha Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kameshwar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Indra Mohan Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Maina Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation

Romi Feleex Thomas Vs The State of Bihar

Smt.Nutan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar